Covering Transaction
Processing Issues Before
They Clear and Settle

01:30 PM, Jul. 31, 2010
DOWNLOAD CURRENT ISSUE (PDF)
CORPORATE ACCESS
CONTACT US
SUBSCRIBE NOW
FREE TRIAL
Skip Navigation Links
NEWS
Home
Top Stories
In The News
Fund Managers
Hedge Funds
Structured Products
Compliance
Utilities
FEATURES
Operations Clarified
Ops Shop Talk
Vendor Directory
Conferences
Awards
Special Supplements
RESOURCES
Archives
Links
Buyer's GuidesExpand Buyer's Guides
Rising StarsExpand Rising Stars
Special IssuesExpand Special Issues
Events
Securities Technology Product & Services Online Guide
Hedge Fund Service Provider Guide
Pension Fund Service Provider Guide
Structured Finance Service Provider Guide
Scroll up
Scroll down
20 Rising Stars of Mutual Funds - 2008
The 20 Rising Stars of Compliance - 2007
The 20 Rising Stars of Retirement Plan Advisors - 2007
The 20 Rising Stars of Wealth Management
The 20 Rising Stars of Hedge Funds
The 20 Rising Stars of Real Estate
Scroll up
Scroll down
Enterprise Data Management Report
Scroll up
Scroll down
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
RSS Feeds
Corporate Access
Reprints
Career Center

Skip Navigation Links
MY ACCOUNT
Login
Update Login Information
Update Account Information
Renew Subscription
CUSTOMER SERVICE
Agents
About OM
Contact Us
Help/FAQ's
ADVERTISING
Advertising Opportunities
SUBSCRIBE
Subscribe
Free Trial

Improving Credit Derivative Operations



A combination of factors has presented severe and on-going operational challenges across the life-cycle of the credit derivatives processing (see Figure 1 for depiction of the credit derivatives processing life-cycle). First, an explosive growth in the trading volumes has put tremendous pressure on the already scarce resources that were managing the credit derivatives processes (see Figure 2a). Second, this has been further complicated by the introduction and subsequent proliferation of increasingly complex products in this space (see Figure 2b). Finally, the increasing involvement of a larger base of participants (especially hedge funds) has compounded the challenges exponentially (see Figure 2c).

One of the key fallouts of these challenges has been the delays and inaccuracies in the confirmation process for credit derivatives potentially exposing financial institutions to disputes, losses and risks--including compliance and reputation related risks. As per Government Accountability Office analysis of Markit more than 150,000 trades in September 2005 were unconfirmed among the 14 major dealers, with more than two thirds being more than 30 days outstanding. One of the key reasons contributing to the backlog was the industry-wide practice of assigning a contract to another participant without consent from the original counterparty--which was exacerbated by the involvement of hedge funds. In addition, the process of confirmation was manual and not scalable, resulting in delays and inaccuracies.

On the settlements side, the key problem area for the financial institutions has been the impact on the ability to make settlements on time, especially delivery of reference obligations for physical settlement. In addition to unconfirmed trades, the key contributors to settlement-related challenges are: (i) a price squeeze on the reference entity that has defaulted, and (ii) lack of adequate back-office personnel to address the high volumes of settlements.

  ...

To read this article, please subscribe or take a free trial.
Subscribe

Subscribers have unlimited access to all current content, email alerts and breaking news. Start your subscription today - click on the button below.

Subscribe

Free Trial

Taking a free trial will give you access to the current issue, email alerts and breaking news for a limited period. Start your free trial today.

Free Trial

Already Have An Account?

Username:
 Password:
Operations Management | DOWNLOAD CURRENT ISSUE (PDF) | Corporate Access | Contact Us | Subscribe | Free Trial | Sitemap
© 2010 Institutional Investor | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy